| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: "Alpha" page unmaingained? Still claims 9.1alpha1 is newest |
| Date: | 2010-11-05 15:05:47 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=86qif6w5B6sU9Yr8Tp7yEVuESqXN_L_UfBRXs@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Cédric Villemain
<cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 2010/11/5 Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>:
>> Hi list,
>
> Hello Marti,
>
>>
>> Apparently nobody is maintaining the postgresql.org "alpha" page as my
>> last email was ignored, but I'll try again regardless.
>
> Your last email wasn't ignored, J.berkus raise new one : '[pgsql-www]
> Please update alpha page'. I hope some of the www-team member will be
> able to update that shortly.
Most of the web team are currently unavailable (or have extremely
limited availability) due to PGWest.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2010-11-05 15:08:02 | Re: "Alpha" page unmaingained? Still claims 9.1alpha1 is newest |
| Previous Message | Cédric Villemain | 2010-11-05 14:46:57 | Re: "Alpha" page unmaingained? Still claims 9.1alpha1 is newest |