Re: Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Howard Rogers <hjr(at)diznix(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search
Date: 2010-07-28 05:24:12
Message-ID: AANLkTi=7S7zPE9FmOpfFQRyaNUgGFFKy3udNyEFBXWXv@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Howard Rogers <hjr(at)diznix(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks to some very helpful input here in earlier threads, I was
> finally able to pull together a working prototype Full Text Search
> 'engine' on PostgreSQL and compare it directly to the way the
> production Oracle Text works. The good news is that PostgreSQL is
> bloody fast! The slightly iffy news is that the boss is now moaning
> about possible training costs!

Someone running Oracle is complaining about training costs? That
seems a bit like complaining about needing to give the bellboy a $1
tip at a $1k a night hotel.

> For what it's worth, I wrote up the performance comparison here:
> http://diznix.com/dizwell/archives/153

Cool, I'll read up. Thanks.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sandeep Srinivasa 2010-07-28 05:51:32 Which CMS/Ecommerce/Shopping cart ?
Previous Message Ravi Katkar 2010-07-28 04:53:02 Re: ODBC and configure