From: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: UNLOGGED tables in psql \d |
Date: | 2011-02-22 11:30:55 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTi=3fjUtZfFqU8a45vv-43c_tCPqYsCGjX6wA7Ek@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 18:11, Cédric Villemain
<cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 2011/2/22 Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> psql \d(+) doesn't show any information about UNLOGGED and TEMP attributes
>> for the table. So, we cannot know the table is unlogged or not unless
>> we directly select from pg_class.relpersistence. Is this a TODO item?
>
> I believe it is in the "title" of the table presented by \d (Table,
> Unlogged table, Temp table)
Ah, I see. Thank you. They are shown as "Unlogged Table" and
"Unlogged Index".
- We don't have "Temp" for temp tables. Should we have?
- The head characters of the second words would be small letters.
We describe other objects as "Composite type", "Foreign table", or so.
--
Itagaki Takahiro
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-22 12:01:02 | Re: Void binary patch |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2011-02-22 10:09:48 | Re: Sync Rep v17 |