On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> That doesn't seem like a big problem to me. I was assuming we'd need
> to remap when the size changed.
I had thought about this in the past too, just for supporting run-time
changes to shared_buffers. I always assumed we would just allocate
shared memory in chunks and create separate mappings for each chunk.
--
greg