Re: pl/python tracebacks

From: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>
Cc: Postgres - Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pl/python tracebacks
Date: 2011-02-12 09:00:30
Message-ID: AANLkTi=26HegqC67MB5ue3cEwJgwNeLCdtGB8H+Sbs9c@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 01:50, Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org> wrote:
> On 12/02/11 04:12, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
>> In PLy_traceback fname and prname look like they will leak (well as
>> much as a palloc() in an error path can leak I suppose).
>
> But they're no palloc'd, no? fname is either a static "<module"> string,
> or PyString_AsString, which also doesn't allocate memory, AFAIK.

Yeah, I was flat out wrong about proname :-(.

As for fname, I must be missing some magic. We have:

#if PY_MAJOR_VERSION > 3
...
#define PyString_AsString(x) PLyUnicode_AsString(x)
....
PLyUnicode_AsString(PyObject *unicode)
{
PyObject *o = PLyUnicode_Bytes(unicode);
char *rv = pstrdup(PyBytes_AsString(o));

Py_XDECREF(o);
return rv;
}

PyString_AsString is used all over the place without any pfrees. But I
have no Idea how that pstrdup() is getting freed if at all.

Care to enlighten me ?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Urbański 2011-02-12 09:07:09 Re: pl/python tracebacks
Previous Message Jan Urbański 2011-02-12 08:50:10 Re: pl/python tracebacks