| From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: documentation navigation |
| Date: | 2011-01-28 02:50:14 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=14m0g71HUBXhKj0jyJV16Ou97rjZ5DinugAR-@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 28 January 2011 02:35, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> There has been discussion about how hard it is to navigate our
> documentation, particularly the lack of an "Up" link at the top of the
> page, and uselessness of the "fast forward/backward" links.
>
> Who is going to correct this? Should I do it? Where should I look?
I'd find it more useful if the navigation were more like the French
version of the docs. Instead of prev/next, it replaces them with the
titles of the sections those links would navigate to, although I think
it would be nicer to precede it with the section number too. I don't
think "up" is particularly useful either, since it's not clear what
page you'll land on, which again, the French docs have solved by
having a breadcrumb-style nav at the top.
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-01-28 03:07:31 | Re: Building PDFs error: \pdfendlink ended up in different nesting level than \pd |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-01-28 02:35:20 | documentation navigation |