| From: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: Triggers on VIEWs |
| Date: | 2010-08-16 17:31:35 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=0NexK-wYOd7CpoWPb+VOzqb3KwgyLU6TgHfZZ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 15 August 2010 18:38, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> There are still a number of things left todo:
> - extend ALTER VIEW with enable/disable trigger commands
On further reflection, I wonder if the ability to disable VIEW
triggers is needed/wanted at all. I just noticed that while it is
possible to disable a RULE on a TABLE, it is not possible to do so on
VIEW. This certainly makes sense for the _RETURN rule, although
possibly some people might have a use for disabling other rules on
views. The situation with triggers is similar - disabling an INSTEAD
OF trigger would be pointless, and could only lead to errors when
updating the view. Some people may have a use case for disabling
BEFORE and AFTER statement triggers on views, but I suspect that the
number of such cases is small, and I'm tempted to omit this, for now
at least.
Thoughts?
- Dean
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-16 17:47:25 | Re: Git migration timeline |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-08-16 17:26:56 | Todays git migration results |