Re: Add support for logging the current role

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add support for logging the current role
Date: 2011-02-16 21:24:32
Message-ID: AANLkTi=-MJ9uZLf_xf44O0Bw5c23bO-ue1gb6G0BUL_e@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> * Andrew Dunstan (andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net) wrote:
>> On 02/15/2011 11:13 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> >Think I suggested that at one point.  I'm all for doing that on a major
>> >version change like this one, but I think we already had some concerns
>> >about that on this thread (Andrew maybe?).
>>
>> I could live with it for a release if I thought we had a clear path
>> ahead, but I think there are some design issues that we need to
>> think about before we start providing for header lines and variable
>> formats in CSV logs, particularly w.r.t. log rotation etc. So I'm
>> slightly nervous about going ahead with this right now.
>
> I believe the suggestion that Robert and I were talking about above was
> to just unilatterally change the CSV log file output format to include
> current_role.  No header lines, no variable output format, etc.
>
> I do think we can make header lines and variable output work, if we can
> get agreement on what the semantics should be.

I think we're back to not having a consensus on a reasonable way to
proceed here. Let's take this up again for 9.2.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-02-16 21:33:40 Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-02-16 21:24:12 Re: using a lot of maintenance_work_mem