From: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: Granting SET and ALTER SYSTE privileges for GUCs |
Date: | 2021-11-23 00:21:42 |
Message-ID: | AAE7FBCE-7C7D-4E92-A57F-D4496B306DDF@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Nov 16, 2021, at 7:03 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> It's also going to be important to think about what happens with
> extension GUCs. If somebody installs an extension, we can't ask them
> to perform a manual step in order to be able to grant privileges. And
> if somebody then loads up a different .so for that extension, the set
> of GUCs that it provides can change without any DDL being executed.
> New GUCs could appear, and old GUCs could vanish.
The v3 patch allows grants on unrecognized guc names. This should allow a grant statement to precede the loading of a new .so which provides the named guc.
> instead just adjust the GRANT command to automatically insert a new
> row into the relevant catalog if there isn't one already. That seems
> nicer for extensions, and also nicer for core GUCs, since it avoids
> bloating the catalog with a bunch of entries that aren't needed.
Grants on GUCs create a new catalog entry if necessary, or update the existing catalog entry if found.
There is a new information_schema.guc_privileges view, not present in v2.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v3-0001-Allow-GRANT-of-SET-and-ALTER-SYSTEM-for-variables.patch | application/octet-stream | 96.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2021-11-23 01:01:14 | Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2021-11-22 23:57:45 | Re: Reduce function call costs on ELF platforms |