From: | Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | preetika tyagi <preetikatyagi(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: query execution time |
Date: | 2011-03-21 20:30:51 |
Message-ID: | AABF2DE3-E820-4BCA-BF36-EDD795C919DC@elevated-dev.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-students |
On Mar 21, 2011, at 12:03 PM, preetika tyagi wrote:
> I tried running the same query after reboot and back-to-back, it was taking less time in both the cases. It means the problem is something else.
>
> Can there be a reason which is more hardware/operating system specific and due to which the behavior is not uniform?
While I do have a couple of ideas, you're probably better served by letting those here with more optimization experience help you, as their answers will be more complete.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2011-03-21 20:45:04 | Re: postgres conferences missing videos? |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2011-03-21 20:22:28 | Re: Passing a table as parameter |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zheng Yang | 2011-03-22 10:51:04 | Re: foreign data wrappers |
Previous Message | Selena Deckelmann | 2011-03-21 19:49:42 | Re: foreign data wrappers |