Re: generate_series() Interpretation

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: generate_series() Interpretation
Date: 2011-06-27 18:38:32
Message-ID: AA76EC8B-7880-466F-A614-8A6DF4060E29@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jun 27, 2011, at 11:36 AM, Steve Crawford wrote:

> The query is marginally trickier. But the better calendaring apps give a variety of options when selecting "repeat": A user who selects June 30, 2011 and wants a monthly repeat might want:
>
> 30th of every month - skip months without a 30th
> 30th of every month - move to end-of-month if 30th doesn't exist
> Last day of every month
> Last Thursday of every month
>
> Typical payday repeats are "the 15th and last -day-of-month if a workday or the closest preceding workday if not", "second and last Friday", "every other Friday"...
>
> No matter how '1 month' is interpreted in generate_series, the application programmer will still need to write the queries required to handle whatever calendar-repeat features are deemed necessary.

Yeah, which is why I said it was subject to interpretation. Of course there's no way to tell generate_series() which to use, which is what I figured.

Thanks,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-06-27 18:50:45 Re: Range Types, constructors, and the type system
Previous Message Steve Crawford 2011-06-27 18:36:14 Re: generate_series() Interpretation