From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Managing multiple branches in git |
Date: | 2009-06-02 16:28:18 |
Message-ID: | AA39676A-D482-4E26-9B7E-E48E85D62D24@kineticode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Jun 2, 2009, at 9:16 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Well, you can have as many clones of a repository as you like. You
>> can
>> keep one with master checked out, another with rel8_3, another with
>> rel8_2, etc. You'd just have to write a script to keep them in sync
>> (shouldn't be too difficult, each just as all the others as an
>> origin --
>> or maybe you have one that's canonical on your system).
>
> Hmm, but is there a way to create those clones from a single local
> "database"?
Yeah, that's what I meant by a "canonical copy on your system."
> (I like the monotone model much better. This mixing of working copies
> and databases as if they were a single thing is silly and
> uncomfortable
> to use.)
Monotone?
Best,
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2009-06-02 16:31:30 | Re: Managing multiple branches in git |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2009-06-02 16:28:04 | Re: Managing multiple branches in git |