RE: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0

I reposted the patch from home yesterday, as bruce pointed it out in
another thread.

Peter

--
Peter T Mount, IT Section
petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk
Anything I write here are my own views, and cannot be taken as the
official words of Maidstone Borough Council

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 1999 5:52 PM
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0

Say guys,

I just noticed that RELSEG_SIZE still hasn't been reduced per the
discussion from early February. Let's make sure that doesn't slip
through the cracks, OK?

I think Peter Mount was supposed to be off testing this issue.
Peter, did you learn anything further?

We should probably apply the patch to REL6_4 as well...

regards, tom lane