| From: | "John D(dot) Burger" <john(at)mitre(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Performance Issues (was: "like" vs "substring" again) |
| Date: | 2007-09-18 18:31:23 |
| Message-ID: | A9A0E5C9-0EDA-4155-BFE9-65F4D59600F5@mitre.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Christian Schröder wrote:
> Or would it be possible to tweak how the planner determines the
> selectivity? I have read in the docs (chapter 54.1) that in case of
> more than one condition in the where clause, independency is
> assumed. In my case ("... where test like '11%' and test not like
> '113%'") this is clearly not the case, so it might be an
> interesting point to address.
I think the planner does think about the interactions of
inequalities, so if you can express your query with less-than and
friends, or even with BETWEEN, you might get a better plan. I don't
know the details of your setup, but you can do things like this with
any ordered type:
where test between '11' and '113'
or test >= '114'
I know this does not match the exact semantics of your query, but
hopefully you get the idea.
- John D. Burger
MITRE
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bill Moseley | 2007-09-18 18:34:04 | Re: pgcrypto: is an IV needed with pgp_sym_encrypt()? |
| Previous Message | Dan99 | 2007-09-18 18:26:41 | PG_DUMP not working |