Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
Cc: Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, rsmogura <rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache
Date: 2011-03-25 18:08:31
Message-ID: A989E53F-C1BA-44BB-AEC9-8898F2C8BC04@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mar 25, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> wrote:
> Related to that... after talking to Greg Smith at PGEast last night, he felt it would be very valuable just to profile how much time is being spent waiting/holding the freelist lock in a real environment. I'm going to see if we can do that on one of our slave databases.

Yeah, that would be great. Also, some LWLOCK_STATS output or oprofile output would be definitely be useful.

...Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gianni Ciolli 2011-03-25 18:09:54 Re: maximum digits for NUMERIC
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2011-03-25 18:01:48 Re: Transactional DDL, but not Serializable