Re: Connections - Postgres 9.2

From: Charles Clavadetscher <clavadetscher(at)swisspug(dot)org>
To: Francisco Olarte <folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com>
Cc: Lucas Possamai <drum(dot)lucas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Connections - Postgres 9.2
Date: 2016-05-16 16:56:35
Message-ID: A956FE23-E541-4E5D-BE91-3842DA6E41F6@swisspug.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hello

> On 16.05.2016, at 18:32, Francisco Olarte <folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi Lucas
>
>> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 4:10 AM, Lucas Possamai <drum(dot)lucas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Those IDLE connections, might be because the user/application didn't commit the transaction?
>
> ​IIRC Those would be 'Idle in transaction' ( which are normally bad if numerous, unless your app has a reason for them, as they are the ones which can block things ). Plain 'Idle' are normally connections between transactions, totally normal if you use poolers, or if your app keeps connection opens while it does other things ( like preparing for a transaction ).
>

There really is a state 'Idle in transaction'? Good to learn.
Thank you and bye
Charles

> Francisco Olarte.
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Francisco Olarte 2016-05-16 17:09:23 Re: Connections - Postgres 9.2
Previous Message Francisco Olarte 2016-05-16 16:32:06 Re: Connections - Postgres 9.2