Re: 9.1.2 ?

From: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
To: Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 9.1.2 ?
Date: 2011-11-10 01:22:04
Message-ID: A9390438-DCA6-4EB7-8394-1B6C9561F0AD@phlo.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Nov9, 2011, at 23:53 , Daniel Farina wrote:
> I think a novice user would be scared half to death: I know I was the
> first time. That's not a great impression for the project to leave
> for what is not, at its root, a vast defect, and the fact it's
> occurring for people when they use rsync rather than my very sensitive
> backup routines is indication that it's not very corner-ey.

Just to emphasize the non-conerish-ness of this problem, it should be
mentioned that the HS issue was observed even with backups taken with
pg_basebackup, if memory serves correctly.

best regards,
Florian Pflug

In response to

  • Re: 9.1.2 ? at 2011-11-09 22:53:41 from Daniel Farina

Responses

  • Re: 9.1.2 ? at 2011-11-12 23:43:51 from Chris Redekop

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2011-11-10 01:39:15 Re: 9.1.2 ?
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2011-11-10 00:06:49 Re: Syntax for partitioning