From: | Henrik <henke(at)mac(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hardware suggestions for high performance 8.3 |
Date: | 2008-06-25 12:15:07 |
Message-ID: | A928E958-6E18-4636-B578-31A131822B64@mac.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
25 jun 2008 kl. 13.15 skrev Matthew Wakeling:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Henrik wrote:
>> What are your suggestions. What we are currently looking at is.
>>
>> Dual Quad Core Intel
>> 8 - 12 GB RAM
>
> More RAM would be helpful. It's not that expensive, compared to the
> rest of your system.
True, as long as I can build the system on 2G or 4G modules I can max
out the banks.
>
>
>> 10 disks total.
>>
>> 4 x 146 GB SAS disk in RAID 1+0 for database
>> 6 x 750 GB SATA disks in RAID 1+0 or RAID 5 for OS and transactions
>> logs.
>>
>> Good RAID controller with lots of memory and BBU.
>
> If you have a good RAID controller with BBU cache, then there's no
> point splitting the discs into two sets. You're only creating an
> opportunity to under-utilise the system. I'd get ten identical discs
> and put them in a single array, probably RAID 10.
OK, thats good to know. Really want to keep it as simple as possible.
Would you turn off fsync if you had a controller with BBU? =)
>
>
> Also, do you really need 6*750GB for OS and transaction logs? How
> big can they be?
Ahh, we are going to save a lot of other datafiles on those also but
maybe i'll just get a cabinett.
>
>
> However, the most important factor is that you get a good BBU cache.
Here that!
Thanks for your input!
//Henke
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Claus Guttesen | 2008-06-25 12:40:30 | Re: Hardware suggestions for high performance 8.3 |
Previous Message | Henrik | 2008-06-25 12:12:15 | Re: Hardware suggestions for high performance 8.3 |