From: | Robert Berger <rwb(at)vtiscan(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Database Performance? |
Date: | 2002-02-17 22:49:55 |
Message-ID: | A9255F60-23F8-11D6-AF47-000502B354E1@vtiscan.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
This argument is out of date. MySQL currently supports
transactions, foreign
keys, and outer joins. (4.1 will support subselects)
As for fault tolerance, MySQL has built in support for replication.
A couple years ago I converted a project from MySQL to PostgreSQL
because
of MySQL's lack of features. I am now in the process of converting
back to
MySQL because of the performance improvements and replication.
>
> Be a little bit careful about benchmarks. Whether postgresql or
> mysql is
> faster depends on what you're doing. If all you want to do is the
> occasional
> insert and lots and lots of simple selects, mysql (or even grep)
> will beat
> postgres. If you want to do subselects, transactions, foreign
> keys, outer
> joins, fault tolerence or anything else that makes a database a
> database,
> mysql just can't do it.
>
> See if MySQL and PostgreSQL satisfy your business requirements and then
> decide which one you want.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Snow | 2002-02-17 23:02:07 | Re: Database Performance? |
Previous Message | Kym Farnik | 2002-02-17 22:09:40 | Re: Question: Who's Using Postgres |