Re: prevent immature WAL streaming

From: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com" <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "mengjuan(dot)cmj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com" <mengjuan(dot)cmj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, "Jakub(dot)Wartak(at)tomtom(dot)com" <Jakub(dot)Wartak(at)tomtom(dot)com>
Subject: Re: prevent immature WAL streaming
Date: 2021-09-07 18:41:57
Message-ID: A8A0CFCE-C39D-440C-9B4D-A4AC1BF38D4B@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/4/21, 10:26 AM, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> Attached are the same patches as last night, except I added a test for
> XLOG_DEBUG where pertinent. (The elog(PANIC) is not made conditional on
> that, since it's a cross-check rather than informative.) Also fixed the
> silly pg_rewind mistake I made.
>
> I'll work on the new xlog record early next week.

Are these patches in a good state for some preliminary testing? I'd
like to try them out, but I'll hold off if they're not quite ready
yet.

Nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2021-09-07 18:49:25 Re: CI/windows docker vs "am a service" autodetection on windows
Previous Message Bossart, Nathan 2021-09-07 18:40:24 Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful