Re: not quite a cross tab query...

From: Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>
To: Postgres Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: not quite a cross tab query...
Date: 2009-03-05 19:29:55
Message-ID: A826A2D8-F33C-4B72-B5D2-FDD7C499CDF8@blighty.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Mar 5, 2009, at 11:17 AM, Richard Greenwood wrote:

> Hello pgsql listers,
>
> I've got a problem that is similar to, but I don't think identical to,
> a cross tab query. My data looks like:
> ID | CAT
> 1 | A
> 1 | B
> 2 | A
> 2 | C
> So for each ID there may be many CAT (categories).
> The client wants it to look like:
> ID | CATS
> 1 | A,B
> 2 | A,C
> Where each ID is unique in the results, and the CAT values are
> concatenated with a comma separator.
>
> There are about 100 unique CAT values. They only way I can see to do
> it is programatically with a for loop. But before I do that I wanted
> to bounce it off the fine minds that inhabit this list.

Sounds like a job for array_accum(), which you can find mentioned
at http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/xaggr.html

select id, array_to_string(array_accum(cat), ',') from table group by
id;

There'll be a built-in array_agg() in 8.4, I think.

Cheers,
Steve

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sathish Duraiswamy 2009-03-05 19:35:15 Re: converting older databases
Previous Message darren 2009-03-05 19:27:15 Re: not quite a cross tab query...