Re: How the Planner in PGStrom differs from PostgreSQL?

From: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
To: "'Mark Anns *EXTERN*'" <aishwaryaanns(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How the Planner in PGStrom differs from PostgreSQL?
Date: 2016-11-15 08:35:45
Message-ID: A737B7A37273E048B164557ADEF4A58B5397D510@ntex2010i.host.magwien.gv.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Mark Anns wrote:
> How the planning factors of PGStrom differs from planning factos of
> PostgreSQL?

I don't know what exactly you mean by a "planning factor".

What PGStrom does is estimate the cost of the GPU operations
and attach these costs to a custom scan node which is part of
a query plan.

Many different plans are generated; some will involve PGStrom,
some will not. The optimizer then chooses among these plans the
one with the lowest total cost.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Anns 2016-11-15 08:35:50 Re: How the Planner in PGStrom differs from PostgreSQL?
Previous Message Karsten Hilbert 2016-11-15 08:31:06 Re: Fwd: Creating multiple instances of postresql on Windows environment