| From: | Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'David G(dot) Johnston *EXTERN*'" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, aluka raju <alukaraju2894(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: postgresql embedded mode |
| Date: | 2016-05-23 13:17:13 |
| Message-ID: | A737B7A37273E048B164557ADEF4A58B53853040@ntex2010i.host.magwien.gv.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 6:54 AM, aluka raju <alukaraju2894(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> As given in the FAQ's that postgresql cannot be embedded
>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/FAQ#Can_PostgreSQL_be_embedded.3F .
>>
>> Is their any possibility to make it embedded. Till now postgresql has not done this embedded
>> mode and i want to work on how it can be embedded and contribute. please help me how to start or
>> suggest the idea-.
>
> Step 1 - Fork the project...
>
> Changing the fundamental architecture of the system is not something I would expect a project with
> this long of history to attempt to do directly. While the people working on the core product are
> welcome to spend their time however they like I don't imagine any of them would be willing to commit
> code to core pertaining to this capability. Most, if not all, of them likely don't believe it is even
> a good idea generally.
There was this patch by Tom Lane in 2012:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/12511.1346631791@sss.pgh.pa.us
This can be used as something like an embedded database.
Nothing more happened with this patch, though.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan de Visser | 2016-05-23 13:30:18 | Re: postgresql embedded mode |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-05-23 12:34:48 | Re: postgresql embedded mode |