| From: | Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Sachin Srivastava *EXTERN*'" <ssr(dot)teleatlas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Function in PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2015-12-09 09:28:41 |
| Message-ID: | A737B7A37273E048B164557ADEF4A58B5100522F@ntex2010i.host.magwien.gv.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Sachin Srivastava wrote:
> Do you know if it is possible to create a function in postgres that has errors in the syntax of the
> creation sql? It would help our conversion process if we could get all of our various functions
> present in postgres even if they aren’t in 100% working shape. Is there any way to ignore errors on
> object creation?
I am not 100% sure what you mean, but does
SET check_function_bodies=off;
fix your problem?
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tim Smith | 2015-12-09 11:20:51 | Postgresql INET select and default route ? |
| Previous Message | Sachin Srivastava | 2015-12-09 08:49:20 | Function in PostgreSQL |