From: | Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "Christian Ullrich *EXTERN*" <chris(at)chrullrich(dot)net>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | "rgullstrom(at)gmail(dot)com" <rgullstrom(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Connecting to Oracle from Postgresql 9.2 on Windows |
Date: | 2013-11-06 08:42:05 |
Message-ID: | A737B7A37273E048B164557ADEF4A58B17C56CDB@ntex2010i.host.magwien.gv.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Christian Ullrich wrote:
> * Albe Laurenz wrote:
>> It should work on 64-bit Windows, but I have no such machine to build it.
>> I'd be happy to publish binaries if somebody can build them.
>
> Every time I go up against what passes for a PostgreSQL build system on
> Windows, I am pleasantly surprised that it is not half as fragile as it
> looks.
>
> I now have working 64-bit builds of oracle_fdw.dll for both 9.2 and 9.3,
> built against the respective git branches. The only thing is, I'm not at
> all conversant with the build environment required for portable
> extension modules. I have been using Visual Studio 2012; do I have to
> build with 2008 to avoid runtime library clashes, or is that not an
> issue here?
I don't know enough about Windows to answer this, but I use
Microsoft Windows SDK for Windows 7 (7.1)
to build my binaries.
As far as I know, that is an outtake from Visual Studio, but
I don't know which version it corresponds to.
Do your DLL work with the PostgreSQL binaries that EnterpriseDB offers for
download? If yes, then I'd be interested in publishing them.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Voinea | 2013-11-07 10:44:59 | Occasional spike in query response time (jumps from 200ms to 45 seconds) |
Previous Message | Christian Ullrich | 2013-11-05 22:33:27 | Re: Connecting to Oracle from Postgresql 9.2 on Windows |