Re: archive falling behind

From: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
To: "German Becker *EXTERN*" <german(dot)becker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Strahinja Kustudic <strahinjak(at)nordeus(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: archive falling behind
Date: 2013-04-26 12:53:27
Message-ID: A737B7A37273E048B164557ADEF4A58B057FFEA2@ntex2010a.host.magwien.gv.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

German Becker wrote:
> From my experience, postgres will delete WAL (after checkpoint) regardless if they have been archived.
> Are you saying this is abnormal?

That would be quite abnormal.
Could it be that your archive_command has exit status 0
even if something goes wrong?

What are the archive settings?

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message German Becker 2013-04-26 13:06:40 Re: archive falling behind
Previous Message German Becker 2013-04-26 12:31:06 Re: archive falling behind