| From: | Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Rural Hunter *EXTERN*" <ruralhunter(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Grant tables cascade to sequence? |
| Date: | 2013-03-29 11:07:33 |
| Message-ID: | A737B7A37273E048B164557ADEF4A58B057D6C0A@ntex2010i.host.magwien.gv.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Rural Hunter wrote:
> I encounter the same issue often: Granted update/insert to an user but
> forgot to grant it on the related sequence. It's hard to understand that
> an user has write access on table but not on necessary sequences. I
> think the grant on tables should cascade to related sequences. What do
> you think?
I think that would make sense.
To me this seems related to the case where table B has a
foreign key to table A with cascading delete or update.
If a user has privileges on A, he or she can change values in
B without having any privileges on B.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig James | 2013-03-29 16:51:22 | Re: Grant tables cascade to sequence? |
| Previous Message | Rural Hunter | 2013-03-29 05:56:58 | Grant tables cascade to sequence? |