From: | Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "Ali Pouya *EXTERN*" <alipouya2(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Partitionning by trigger |
Date: | 2013-02-26 10:51:34 |
Message-ID: | A737B7A37273E048B164557ADEF4A58B057B8939@ntex2010a.host.magwien.gv.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Ali Pouya wrote:
> I sent the following mail yesterday but I do not see it in the list.
> So I retry
It is there all right:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAEEEPmwq_3=hGEC69-2EkCWTiwq0dme==8SoU29E9k2DCCgUEw@mail.gmail.com
> I have created a partitionned table and a Pl/PgSQL trigger exactly as explained here
> <http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/ddl-partitioning.html> in the documentation.
>
> It works fine but the INSERT and COPY commands return zero instead of the number of the rows actually
> inserted. Worse : the RETURNING clause returns NULL when inserting through the trigger.
>
> I encounter the same problem with a C language trigger function.
>
> Is there anyway to obtain a behavior similar to that of the direct insertion ?
I don't think that is possible.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2013-02-26 12:22:52 | Re: JDBC not returning update count from updateable view |
Previous Message | Ali Pouya | 2013-02-26 10:14:53 | Partitionning by trigger |