From: | "ascot(dot)moss(at)gmail(dot)com" <ascot(dot)moss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Luca Ferrari <fluca1978(at)infinito(dot)it> |
Cc: | "ascot(dot)moss(at)gmail(dot)com" <ascot(dot)moss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Recovery.conf and PITR |
Date: | 2013-08-09 12:17:09 |
Message-ID: | A71D4623-B71B-48FE-A6EF-D1E2B57C7AD0@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-general |
On 9 Aug 2013, at 7:09 PM, Luca Ferrari wrote:
> Uhm...I guess the problem is not about the txid being included or not:
> the recovery target was 75634 and the transaction 75666 appeared, so
> the problem seems to be an out-of-order commit of the transactions. In
> such case making the inclusive false will not cause 75666 to appear if
> it has committed before the target xid, or am I wrong?
Hi,
Is there a way to query the master (it is up and running) about the actual commit sequence by transaction IDs?
regards
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ascot.moss@gmail.com | 2013-08-09 13:07:59 | Recovery.conf and PITR by recovery_target_time |
Previous Message | Ian Lawrence Barwick | 2013-08-09 12:12:49 | Re: archive folder housekeeping |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ascot.moss@gmail.com | 2013-08-09 13:07:59 | Recovery.conf and PITR by recovery_target_time |
Previous Message | Ian Lawrence Barwick | 2013-08-09 12:12:49 | Re: archive folder housekeeping |