Re: Linux LSB init script

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Linux LSB init script
Date: 2009-09-02 02:11:17
Message-ID: A55FE044-7A62-4D38-9ED1-7221558B0542@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sep 1, 2009, at 6:43 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

>> Debatable, but it's not upstream default, so why should it be
>> downstream
>> default?
>
> FWIW, that particular issue is invariably a matter of distro policy;
> they could care less what upstream's default is.

Well, they could, but do they?

/me offers Tom a "not".

Best,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-09-02 02:23:59 Re: Linux LSB init script
Previous Message Gokulakannan Somasundaram 2009-09-02 02:10:40 Re: A bug in scan.l