| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: race condition in sync rep |
| Date: | 2011-03-26 16:39:24 |
| Message-ID: | A45BB11C-B001-43D1-88B1-240EBF53F0DD@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mar 26, 2011, at 12:24 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> In particular, in view of today's fix, shouldn't this commit be reverted?
>>>
>>> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=6e8e7cc580665ddd43c8ca2acc6d60f345570a57
>>>
>>> I thought at the time that that was nothing more than documenting a
>>> known bug, and now it is documenting a dead bug.
>
>> No, that doc change is still accurate.
>
> Well, in that case, it should be on the open-items list. If the system
> is still behaving that way, it's a bug.
I suspect it's fixed, but I haven't checked yet.
And contrary to Simon's contention on a nearby email, it was not a "slight" performance degradation. It was running at like 1 tps.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-03-26 16:41:28 | Re: race condition in sync rep |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-03-26 16:38:40 | Re: 9.1 Beta |