From: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: No SPF record for postgresql.org? |
Date: | 2016-10-16 19:29:13 |
Message-ID: | A3CDB380-1233-4FC3-BD00-A3CBD6C31D3D@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 16 Oct 2016, at 19:28, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> I've been tinkering with setting up SPF-based filtering on my mail
> server, and I was surprised to find out that most of the traffic
> it would want to throw away is Postgres mailing list messages.
> Why is it that there's no SPF record for postgresql.org? I realize
> that there's debate about how useful SPF actually is, but surely
> that's not a reason not to publish an SPF entry.
As an extra data point, the lack of SPF and DKIM for postgresql.org
is a bit of a pain when using @postgresql.org email address too. :(
Especially to Yahoo email users.
Maybe thankfully, Yahoo might not be a problem for that much longer. ;)
+ Justin
--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2016-10-16 19:32:10 | Re: No SPF record for postgresql.org? |
Previous Message | Christoph Berg | 2016-10-16 19:16:42 | Re: Ubuntu: Remove Wily, add Yakkety |