Re: help with front/backend datatype converting

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: imad <immaad(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Do, Leon (Leon)" <leondo(at)lucent(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: help with front/backend datatype converting
Date: 2006-11-11 13:00:28
Message-ID: A3C30E98-3D7F-429B-B8EB-D7A5D53F1821@fastcrypt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc


On 11-Nov-06, at 6:40 AM, imad wrote:

> On 11/11/06, Do, Leon (Leon) <leondo(at)lucent(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dave,
>>
>>
>>
>> I see you raised a lot of issues about this problem but I don't
>> have any
>> suggestion as of now. I'll think about it.
>>
>>
>>
>> On the side, the timezone for timestamp is always sending in this
>> format:
>>
>> 2006-11-10 14:36:19.213000 -0500
>>
>>
>>
>> should it be
>>
>> 2006-11-10 14:36:19.213000 -05:00
>
> this is better.
Why ? 0500 is perfectly acceptable to postgres
>
>
> --Imad
> www.EnterpriseDB.com
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paesold 2006-11-11 21:07:17 Re: JDBC Support for standard_conforming_strings
Previous Message imad 2006-11-11 11:40:04 Re: help with front/backend datatype converting