| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | troy(at)frericks(dot)us, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Consistency of units (bits vs bytes) |
| Date: | 2022-11-15 10:15:51 |
| Message-ID: | A38B4156-5818-4F28-8AC1-CBAA48757026@yesql.se |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
> On 14 Nov 2022, at 20:12, PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/datatype-uuid.html
> Description:
>
> One can describe the size of datatypes in the common units of bits or bytes.
> It'd be desirable to be consistent. Please reference these two pages...
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/datatype-numeric.html (data types
> sized in bytes)
> and
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/datatype-uuid.html (data type sized
> in bits)
These are different things, the page with numeric types discuss the number of
bytes used to store the values. UUIDs are defined in the RFC as 128-bit
identifiers, which is related to but not by definition the same as the space
used to store them in the database.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | PG Doc comments form | 2022-11-16 10:26:38 | temporary file size clarification |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-11-14 21:11:56 | Re: Mistake in Syntax definition of ALTER TABLE |