From: | David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: MySQL-ism help patch for psql |
Date: | 2010-01-19 22:00:14 |
Message-ID: | A357EFC4-EB82-447D-A08E-BC97867D3D08@endpoint.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Jan 19, 2010, at 3:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com> writes:
>> On Jan 19, 2010, at 2:58 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
>>> well those are the most common ones I guess for the current version
>>> of the mysql commandline client - but what about future versions or
>>> the fact that we only have partial replacements for some of those
>>> that people are really asking for?
>
>> I think it captures the intent of the people using the tool, and that
>> it adds a small net benefit in usability for those people. Deciding
>> to support this small subset does not obligate you to expand the
>> scope
>> in the future. (Hey ma, this slope ain't slippery!)
>
> I thought Magnus had a really good point: covering these four cases
> will
> probably be enough to teach newbies to look at psql's backslash
> commands. And once they absorb that, we're over a big hump.
Okay, so I can revise the code to cover those four cases specifically
(or three, depending); is there any specific feedback as to the output/
formatting of the messages themselves?
Currently, a session will look like the following:
machack:machack:5485=# show tables;
See:
\d
or \? for general help with psql commands
machack:machack:5485=#
Said formatting looks like it could use some improvement, open to
suggestions, but something on a single line seems more useful.
> Also, TTBOMK these commands have been in mysql for many years. I
> don't
> think that commands that might get introduced in future versions would
> have anywhere near the same degree of wired-into-the-fingertips uptake
> to them.
They were in there since when I last used mysql on a regular basis, so
going on 10 years now. i.e., pretty safe, and pretty engrained in
muscle-memory.
Regards,
David
--
David Christensen
End Point Corporation
david(at)endpoint(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Christensen | 2010-01-19 22:04:33 | Re: MySQL-ism help patch for psql |
Previous Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2010-01-19 21:57:06 | Re: MySQL-ism help patch for psql |