Re: WIP: Rework access method interface

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: WIP: Rework access method interface
Date: 2016-01-16 17:47:53
Message-ID: A313E0A9-9629-4D69-A555-05D617288CC7@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On January 16, 2016 6:32:47 PM GMT+01:00, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

>As for modularity, nobody's moaned particularly about the
>amcostestimate
>functions all being in selfuncs.c. It all depends on what you think is
>"modular".

Well, back then you couldn't really have a production grade indeed as an extension. With this were getting pretty close to being able to do that for a bunch of useful indexes.

Andres

---
Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2016-01-16 18:10:05 Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-01-16 17:32:47 Re: WIP: Rework access method interface