> On Oct 16, 2023, at 2:55 PM, Amit Sharma <amitpgsql(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> My question is, is there any downside of using a similar partition option in PostgreSQL from performance or manageability perspective? Has anyone dealt with a similar type of partition issues? Is there any other alternate option we should be using?
It's not unreasonable. But an alternative is to have a set, fewer, number of partitions and hash partition. You could wind up with better balanced partitions, and the cost of on average larger partitions.