Re: RAID0 and pg_xlog

From: "Welty, Richard" <richard(dot)welty(at)bankofamerica(dot)com>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Qingqing Zhuo <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RAID0 and pg_xlog
Date: 2005-09-07 18:06:12
Message-ID: A209FE4DA934614CAF3F5BD8E5E14290B0DD33@ex2k.bankofamerica.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>No more or less so than putting your main database on RAID0. If any
>drive fails, you lose everything.

perhaps it's time to start writing it [^r]A[^i]D 0 to try and make
the point.

richard

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-09-07 18:06:36 Re: 64 bits?
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2005-09-07 18:02:18 Re: RAID0 and pg_xlog