Re: A motion

From: Neil <neil(at)fairwindsoft(dot)com>
To: Roxanne Reid-Bennett <rox(at)tara-lu(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A motion
Date: 2016-01-25 04:00:09
Message-ID: A2084285-89F9-45F2-8D5A-38DD52AC342A@fairwindsoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> On Jan 24, 2016, at 7:59 PM, Roxanne Reid-Bennett <rox(at)tara-lu(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On 1/23/2016 3:31 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> On 01/23/2016 03:08 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>>>> On 01/23/2016 03:03 PM, Berend Tober wrote:
>>>> Adrian Klaver wrote:
>>>>> Motion:
>>>>>
>>>>> The Coc discussion be moved to its own list where those who care can
>>>>> argue to their hearts content and leave the rest of us to deal with
>>>>> technical questions. Upon a decision on said list the result be posted
>>>>> to the Postgres web site for consideration.
>>>>
>>>> Been suggested already, and rejected:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/56970135.6060203@computer.org
>>>
>>> I'm an optimist.
>>
>> With respect Adrian, that is a motion that never stands a chance. If you don't want to read it, set up a filter that sends it right to the round file.
>
> I've drafted any number of emails to respond to some point in the CoC discussion and chosen to NOT sent them... primarily because I don't see that my opinion needs to be expressed individually - others have expressed the general gist... and what I would likely say will just contribute to noise.
>

+1, except I worry that my silence will be drowned out by the "sustained disruption"

> I am pretty much attempting to ignore the threads at this point, skipping through them to find the technical discussions. You are welcome to respond with a regex that will filter them for us - I haven't found one that will catch
> every thread.
>
> But this is where I will chip in... IMHO (and apparently Adrian's as well) the CoC discussion became a "sustained disruption" of the communal space - and I'll add - a long time ago.
>
> +1 to Adrian's suggestion - move it into it's own list. That Adrian is finding it necessary to leave the -GENERAL list due to the noise... is Irony with a capital "I" given your stated reasons for the group needing a CoC.
>
> Roxanne
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

In response to

  • Re: A motion at 2016-01-25 01:59:43 from Roxanne Reid-Bennett

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Smith 2016-01-25 04:09:43 TABLESAMPLE usage
Previous Message Matt 2016-01-25 02:45:15 Performance options for CPU bound multi-SUM query