Re: Windows: openssl & gssapi dislike each other

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Imran Zaheer <imran(dot)zhir(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Windows: openssl & gssapi dislike each other
Date: 2025-01-24 21:45:23
Message-ID: A1DB6D42-1C26-453A-AE18-DA922BB7DA8C@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 24 Jan 2025, at 21:07, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> On 2025-01-22 We 4:25 AM, Dave Page wrote:

>> Anyway, no fix was committed as far as I know. I would suggest it should be back-patched as well.
>
> I'm quite partial to the approach suggested upthread by Andres (a separate pg_gssapi.h file). If there's agreement on that I'm prepared to go and make it happen, unless Daniel beats me to it. Backpatching also seems reasonable.

Thanks for the reminder, I also agree that Andres' suggestion is the best
option. I hacked up a patch but got distracted by the pgcrypto GUC patch for a
bit. I'll share what I have once I've done a little testing.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Jones 2025-01-24 22:11:06 Re: XMLDocument (SQL/XML X030)
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2025-01-24 21:37:39 Re: [PATCH] SVE popcount support