| From: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | 'Andrew Dunstan' <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Couldn't make check |
| Date: | 2004-05-08 10:34:09 |
| Message-ID: | A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F444@harris.memetrics.local |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> But the question was not about daily use of pgsql. It was specifically
> about running 'make check', for which we should *not* rely on existing
> environment settings. What if we have version A installed and we want
> to test version B? If we rely on existing PATH settings we'll pick up the
> wrong DLLs.
One further data-point. I run 'make check' under MingW just fine, without
any changes to PATH (via pg_regress, the command line, or otherwise). Only
changes to head are those to resolve PKGLIBDIR and friends, which iirc Bruce
is working on.
Cheers,
Claudio
---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-05-08 10:48:45 | Re: Couldn't make check |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-05-08 10:18:09 | Re: Couldn't make check |