Re: APC/socket fix (final?)

From: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
To: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>, 'Tom Lane' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: 'Magnus Hagander' <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "'pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: APC/socket fix (final?)
Date: 2004-03-26 22:53:07
Message-ID: A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F3C9@harris.memetrics.local
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

> Tom Lane wrote:
> > What happens if the socket() call fails?
>
> Then we return in error. Refer to attachment.

Doh. You *were* referring to the attachment. Ok, so it'll need a check to
make sure the socket actually does get created, but this isn't a fatal flaw,
right? [is a work in progress I bashed out about 30 minutes ago].

I'm actually pretty hopeful over this patch, passes regression tests just
fine, lets us remove the win32_pgstat cruft, let's us easily mirror the unix
semantics, ...

Hopeless, or cute, work-around?

Cheers,
Claudio

---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-03-26 22:57:09 Re: APC/socket fix (final?)
Previous Message Claudio Natoli 2004-03-26 22:47:14 Re: APC/socket fix (final?)