From: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | 'Tom Lane ' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, 'Bruce Momjian ' <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>, "''pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org' '" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Win32 regression test status |
Date: | 2004-03-09 01:08:34 |
Message-ID: | A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F365@harris.memetrics.local |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Hi guys,
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Agreed, we don't add them to all joins, but don't we historically add
> > ORDER BY to queries that are shown to be sensitive to qsort
> > implementations on various platforms? Are you suggesting we create a
> > separate regression output file for that platform?
>
> I'm not suggesting any particular solution yet, just pointing out that
> there are reasons to look for alternatives rather than automatically
> adding ORDER BY.
Doesn't seem to be a consensus here, so:
Tom, I'm happy at looking at whatever alternatives you can suggest.
Bruce, failing the above, I'm happy to check + provide the required ORDER BY
patch.
Cheers,
Claudio
---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-10 22:56:07 | fsync with sync, and Win32 unlink |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-08 19:26:55 | Re: Win32 regression test status |