| From: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | 'Magnus Hagander' <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
| Subject: | socket calls in signal handler (WAS: APC + socket restrictions un der Win32?) |
| Date: | 2004-03-08 10:12:52 |
| Message-ID: | A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F362@harris.memetrics.local |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi all,
Was just discussing the issues related to the above off list with Magnus:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers-win32/2004-03/msg00041.php
Whilst we can think of a number of work-arounds (the simplest being a
suggestion by Magnus: set a flag, like APCcalled, to false before the
select() call, and repeat the select() if APCcalled == true on return from
select), we were wondering if having socket calls inside signal handlers was
a good idea in any case?
The specific (and possibly only? are their others?) issue is the call to
pgstat_beterm from reaper/CleanupProc, invoked by a SIGCHLD. Can this call
be deferred to the main loop (ie. ServerLoop) and is there any merit in
doing so?
[Seems like pgstat_fetch_stat_numbackends could get seriously out of date,
in pathological scenarios... other gotchas?]
Cheers,
Claudio
---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | zhuangjifeng | 2004-03-08 10:59:41 | |
| Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2004-03-08 07:44:00 | Re: avg() for timestamp |