| From: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | 'Tom Lane' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: fork/exec |
| Date: | 2004-02-01 23:33:23 |
| Message-ID: | A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F2B4@harris.memetrics.local |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> It needs rewritten. The hacks inserted for ExecBackend have largely
> destroyed the former structure (such as it was), and the lack of any
> commentary added with said hacks didn't help. I am thinking
> of tackling that rewrite once the dust has settled.
Anything in particular?
With your SubPostmaster suggestion, the split of BackendRun (ne:
BackendFork) and BackendInit could now be undone (and I had a TODO item to
ask the list if such a reversion was desirable, and provide said patch)...
but other than that I don't see where any former structure re: backend
creation has been destroyed.
Cheers,
Claudio
---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-01 23:57:39 | Re: fork/exec |
| Previous Message | Claudio Natoli | 2004-02-01 23:11:43 | Re: fork/exec |