| From: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | 'Merlin Moncure ' <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org '" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, 'Magnus Hagander ' <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Win32 signal code - first try |
| Date: | 2004-01-13 23:43:18 |
| Message-ID: | A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F262@harris.memetrics.local |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> IMO, it's time for a second run of the code, and a functional test which
> simulates the command processing loop which should include:
>
> 1. setjmp/longjmp stack manipulation (i.e. ELOG)
> 2. in process/out of process generates signals
> 3. all thread mechanisms.
Definitely. Magnus, I assume you have an interest in continuing this? (if
not, I'll gladly take it over, but I suspect you'll be wanting to ;-)
In any case, I'll independently see if I can get this mechanism wedged into
my win32 code base, and actually try it within postgres itself (when I get
the chance).
Cheers,
Claudio
---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-01-14 00:05:31 | Re: failed to re-find parent key |
| Previous Message | Claudio Natoli | 2004-01-13 23:35:41 | Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question |