| From: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>, 'Tom Lane ' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "''''pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org' ' ' '" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question |
| Date: | 2004-01-13 09:44:11 |
| Message-ID: | A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F25D@harris.memetrics.local |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Ok, I think having a native win32 spin-lock implementation
> (say, based on InterlockedCompareExchange?) is the minimal
> impact answer. I'll work on producing that.
Or, maybe we'll just use the tas() implementation that already exists for
__i386__/__x86_64__ in s_lock.h. How did I miss that?
Move along. Nothing to see here.
Cheers,
Claudio
---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2004-01-13 12:42:41 | Re: Encoding problems in PostgreSQL with XML data |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-01-13 08:19:15 | Re: Reserved words and named function parameters |