From: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | 'Andrew Dunstan' <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_usleep |
Date: | 2003-12-31 02:33:09 |
Message-ID: | A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B0280B1@harris.memetrics.local |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches |
> patch + new file attached. Haven't tested on Windows, but
> should be fine.
Would be, except for a small typo (conditional operator has an additional :
instead of a ?). Also, we might want to change to SleepEx, depending on how
we eventually get signals implemented, but that's a story for another day.
This, + the pipe() patch from a couple days ago, means we can just about
tick off the "Problems with select()" item on the Win32 TODO list :-)
Cheers,
Claudio
---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-12-31 14:12:43 | Re: pg_usleep |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-12-30 18:58:53 | pg_usleep |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-12-31 02:40:41 | Re: [PATCHES] Quoting of psql \d output |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-12-30 23:12:35 | Solaris thread patch |