From: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | 'Bruce Momjian' <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
Date: | 2003-11-18 15:10:29 |
Message-ID: | A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B02802B@harris.memetrics.local |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Speaking of which, any ETA on this? Bruce? If anyone from
> core can indicate
> > how they'd like this architected (from the perspective of code
> > rearrangement), I'm willing to have a crack at this.
>
> http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/win32.html
No, sorry, I should have been clearer. Here I was referring specifically to
the fork/exec parts, not the entire porting effort.
[I remembered a post of yours of a few weeks ago, mentioning that the
fork/exec bits might be in in "a few weeks"; something along the lines of
that it was taking you a while not due to "issues", but simply a lack of
time (can't find the exact message; might be mis-remembering)]
Probably something you are close to completing, but if not, and you can
describe how you'd prefer any rearrangement, I'm happy taking this one.
Cheers,
Claudio
---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-18 15:18:38 | Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-18 15:01:14 | Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-18 15:18:38 | Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-18 15:01:14 | Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |