From: | Michael Glaesemann <michael(dot)glaesemann(at)myyearbook(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Joshua D(dot) Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: \df displaying volatility |
Date: | 2008-05-24 12:47:58 |
Message-ID: | A02925AB-15BF-4488-AA94-988B7D0BEF5B@myyearbook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On May 23, 2008, at 8:57 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Would anyone object to \df displaying a function's volatility? Maybe
>> limit it to \df+?
>> Ideally we would have a short header for the column so that it
>> doesn't
>> take too much space, and specify the setting with a single letter.
>> The
>> meaning of each letter we could display at the bottom of the table
>> as a
>> footer (something we were going to do for \z too I think?)
>> Thoughts?
>
> I think it would be about time :) +1
I'd like to see the function comment as well in \df+. (And probably
for most database objects that don't already show the comment.)
Michael Glaesemann
michael(dot)glaesemann(at)myyearbook(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-05-24 14:00:45 | Re: May Commitfest is done! |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2008-05-24 12:08:51 | Updated patch (Re: WITH RECURSIVE patch V0.1) |